FRET-based dynamic structural biology: Challenges, perspectives and an appeal for open-science practices
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
FRET-based dynamic structural biology : Challenges, perspectives and an appeal for open-science practices. / Lerner, Eitan; Barth, Anders; Hendrix, Jelle; Ambrose, Benjamin; Birkedal, Victoria; Blanchard, Scott C.; Börner, Richard; Chung, Hoi Sung; Cordes, Thorben; Craggs, Timothy D.; Deniz, Ashok A.; Diao, Jiajia; Fei, Jingyi; Gonzalez, Ruben L.; Gopich, Irina V.; Ha, Taekjip; Hanke, Christian A.; Haran, Gilad; Hatzakis, Nikos S.; Hohng, Sungchul; Hong, Seok Cheol; Hugel, Thorsten; Ingargiola, Antonino; Joo, Chirlmin; Kapanidis, Achillefs N.; Kim, Harold D.; Laurence, Ted; Lee, Nam Ki; Lee, Tae Hee; Lemke, Edward A.; Margeat, Emmanuel; Michaelis, Jens; Michalet, Xavier; Myong, Sua; Nettels, Daniel; Peulen, Thomas Otavio; Ploetz, Evelyn; Razvag, Yair; Robb, Nicole C.; Schuler, Benjamin; Soleimaninejad, Hamid; Tang, Chun; Vafabakhsh, Reza; Lamb, Don C.; Seidel, Claus A.M.; Weiss, Shimon; Boudker, Olga.
I: eLife, Bind 10, e60416, 2021.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - FRET-based dynamic structural biology
T2 - Challenges, perspectives and an appeal for open-science practices
AU - Lerner, Eitan
AU - Barth, Anders
AU - Hendrix, Jelle
AU - Ambrose, Benjamin
AU - Birkedal, Victoria
AU - Blanchard, Scott C.
AU - Börner, Richard
AU - Chung, Hoi Sung
AU - Cordes, Thorben
AU - Craggs, Timothy D.
AU - Deniz, Ashok A.
AU - Diao, Jiajia
AU - Fei, Jingyi
AU - Gonzalez, Ruben L.
AU - Gopich, Irina V.
AU - Ha, Taekjip
AU - Hanke, Christian A.
AU - Haran, Gilad
AU - Hatzakis, Nikos S.
AU - Hohng, Sungchul
AU - Hong, Seok Cheol
AU - Hugel, Thorsten
AU - Ingargiola, Antonino
AU - Joo, Chirlmin
AU - Kapanidis, Achillefs N.
AU - Kim, Harold D.
AU - Laurence, Ted
AU - Lee, Nam Ki
AU - Lee, Tae Hee
AU - Lemke, Edward A.
AU - Margeat, Emmanuel
AU - Michaelis, Jens
AU - Michalet, Xavier
AU - Myong, Sua
AU - Nettels, Daniel
AU - Peulen, Thomas Otavio
AU - Ploetz, Evelyn
AU - Razvag, Yair
AU - Robb, Nicole C.
AU - Schuler, Benjamin
AU - Soleimaninejad, Hamid
AU - Tang, Chun
AU - Vafabakhsh, Reza
AU - Lamb, Don C.
AU - Seidel, Claus A.M.
AU - Weiss, Shimon
AU - Boudker, Olga
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Single-molecule FRET (smFRET) has become a mainstream technique for studying biomolecular structural dynamics. The rapid and wide adoption of smFRET experiments by an ever- increasing number of groups has generated significant progress in sample preparation, measurement procedures, data analysis, algorithms and documentation. Several labs that employ smFRET approaches have joined forces to inform the smFRET community about streamlining how to perform experiments and analyze results for obtaining quantitative information on biomolecular structure and dynamics. The recent efforts include blind tests to assess the accuracy and the precision of smFRET experiments among different labs using various procedures. These multi-lab studies have led to the development of smFRET procedures and documentation, which are important when submitting entries into the archiving system for integrative structure models, PDB- Dev. This position paper describes the current ‘state of the art’ from different perspectives, points to unresolved methodological issues for quantitative structural studies, provides a set of ‘soft recommendations’ about which an emerging consensus exists, and lists openly available resources for newcomers and seasoned practitioners. To make further progress, we strongly encourage ‘open science’ practices.
AB - Single-molecule FRET (smFRET) has become a mainstream technique for studying biomolecular structural dynamics. The rapid and wide adoption of smFRET experiments by an ever- increasing number of groups has generated significant progress in sample preparation, measurement procedures, data analysis, algorithms and documentation. Several labs that employ smFRET approaches have joined forces to inform the smFRET community about streamlining how to perform experiments and analyze results for obtaining quantitative information on biomolecular structure and dynamics. The recent efforts include blind tests to assess the accuracy and the precision of smFRET experiments among different labs using various procedures. These multi-lab studies have led to the development of smFRET procedures and documentation, which are important when submitting entries into the archiving system for integrative structure models, PDB- Dev. This position paper describes the current ‘state of the art’ from different perspectives, points to unresolved methodological issues for quantitative structural studies, provides a set of ‘soft recommendations’ about which an emerging consensus exists, and lists openly available resources for newcomers and seasoned practitioners. To make further progress, we strongly encourage ‘open science’ practices.
U2 - 10.7554/eLife.60416
DO - 10.7554/eLife.60416
M3 - Review
C2 - 33779550
AN - SCOPUS:85102290974
VL - 10
JO - eLife
JF - eLife
SN - 2050-084X
M1 - e60416
ER -
ID: 260361077