Determination of kinetic energy release from metastable peak widths: An investigation of the instrument-dependence

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Determination of kinetic energy release from metastable peak widths : An investigation of the instrument-dependence. / Petersen, Allan Christian; Sølling, Theis Ivan.

I: International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, Bind 429, 2018, s. 14-17.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Petersen, AC & Sølling, TI 2018, 'Determination of kinetic energy release from metastable peak widths: An investigation of the instrument-dependence', International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, bind 429, s. 14-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2017.04.002

APA

Petersen, A. C., & Sølling, T. I. (2018). Determination of kinetic energy release from metastable peak widths: An investigation of the instrument-dependence. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 429, 14-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2017.04.002

Vancouver

Petersen AC, Sølling TI. Determination of kinetic energy release from metastable peak widths: An investigation of the instrument-dependence. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 2018;429:14-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2017.04.002

Author

Petersen, Allan Christian ; Sølling, Theis Ivan. / Determination of kinetic energy release from metastable peak widths : An investigation of the instrument-dependence. I: International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 2018 ; Bind 429. s. 14-17.

Bibtex

@article{bfa7ae18dd2440f29111a03a8b6d6716,
title = "Determination of kinetic energy release from metastable peak widths: An investigation of the instrument-dependence",
abstract = "The kinetic energy that is released upon bond rupture is often represented as T1/2. A value that is derived from the FWHM of a fragment peak by the use of two different conversion formulas. The choice of formula depends on whether the peak is recorded by scanning a magnetic sector or an electrostatic analyzer. We have conducted a systematic variation of the possible scan configurations of two different double focusing instruments in two countries. We have found that a double focusing mass spectrometer in normal geometry gives rise to T1/2 values that are 1.4 times larger when analyzing peaks that are obtained from magnet scans compared to the peaks that are obtained by scanning an electrostatic analyzer. The E scans (MIKE experiments) give rise to the same values for both of the employed mass spectrometers. The results are explained in terms of energy defocusing when the reactions take place too far away from the focal points and show that only the E scans T1/2 values can be compared from instrument to instrument.",
keywords = "Kinetic energy release, Sector mass spectrometry",
author = "Petersen, {Allan Christian} and S{\o}lling, {Theis Ivan}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijms.2017.04.002",
language = "English",
volume = "429",
pages = "14--17",
journal = "International Journal of Mass Spectrometry",
issn = "1387-3806",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determination of kinetic energy release from metastable peak widths

T2 - An investigation of the instrument-dependence

AU - Petersen, Allan Christian

AU - Sølling, Theis Ivan

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The kinetic energy that is released upon bond rupture is often represented as T1/2. A value that is derived from the FWHM of a fragment peak by the use of two different conversion formulas. The choice of formula depends on whether the peak is recorded by scanning a magnetic sector or an electrostatic analyzer. We have conducted a systematic variation of the possible scan configurations of two different double focusing instruments in two countries. We have found that a double focusing mass spectrometer in normal geometry gives rise to T1/2 values that are 1.4 times larger when analyzing peaks that are obtained from magnet scans compared to the peaks that are obtained by scanning an electrostatic analyzer. The E scans (MIKE experiments) give rise to the same values for both of the employed mass spectrometers. The results are explained in terms of energy defocusing when the reactions take place too far away from the focal points and show that only the E scans T1/2 values can be compared from instrument to instrument.

AB - The kinetic energy that is released upon bond rupture is often represented as T1/2. A value that is derived from the FWHM of a fragment peak by the use of two different conversion formulas. The choice of formula depends on whether the peak is recorded by scanning a magnetic sector or an electrostatic analyzer. We have conducted a systematic variation of the possible scan configurations of two different double focusing instruments in two countries. We have found that a double focusing mass spectrometer in normal geometry gives rise to T1/2 values that are 1.4 times larger when analyzing peaks that are obtained from magnet scans compared to the peaks that are obtained by scanning an electrostatic analyzer. The E scans (MIKE experiments) give rise to the same values for both of the employed mass spectrometers. The results are explained in terms of energy defocusing when the reactions take place too far away from the focal points and show that only the E scans T1/2 values can be compared from instrument to instrument.

KW - Kinetic energy release

KW - Sector mass spectrometry

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijms.2017.04.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ijms.2017.04.002

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85018444786

VL - 429

SP - 14

EP - 17

JO - International Journal of Mass Spectrometry

JF - International Journal of Mass Spectrometry

SN - 1387-3806

ER -

ID: 178350739