Modeling the degradation and disinfection of water pollutants by photocatalysts and composites: A critical review
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Modeling the degradation and disinfection of water pollutants by photocatalysts and composites : A critical review. / Ateia, Mohamed; Alalm, Mohamed Gar; Awfa, Dion; Johnson, Matthew S.; Yoshimura, Chihiro.
I: Science of the Total Environment, Bind 698, 134197, 2020, s. 1-16.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Modeling the degradation and disinfection of water pollutants by photocatalysts and composites
T2 - A critical review
AU - Ateia, Mohamed
AU - Alalm, Mohamed Gar
AU - Awfa, Dion
AU - Johnson, Matthew S.
AU - Yoshimura, Chihiro
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Recently, a series of new photocatalysts have been developed for to combat diverse bio-recalcitrant contaminants and the inactivation of bacteria. Modeling photocatalytic processes is important to assess these materials, and to understand and optimize their performance. In this study, the recent literature is critically reviewed and analyzed to identify and compare methods of modeling photocatalytic performance. The Langmuir–Hinshelwood model (L-H) has been used in many studies to rationalize the degradation kinetics of single contaminants because it is the simplest model including both the adsorption equilibrium and degradation rates. Other studies report the development of more sophisticated variants of the L-H model that include the rates of catalyst excitation, recombination of electron-hole pairs, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and formation of by-products. Modified Chick-Watson (C[sbnd]W) and Hom models have been used by many researchers to include lag phases of bacteria in the description of disinfection kinetics. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have been used to analyze the effects of operational conditions on photocatalyst performance. Moreover, response surface methodology (RSM) has been employed for experimental design, and optimization of operational conditions. We have reviewed and analyzed all available articles that model photocatalytic activity towards water pollution, summarized and put them in context, and recommended future research directions.
AB - Recently, a series of new photocatalysts have been developed for to combat diverse bio-recalcitrant contaminants and the inactivation of bacteria. Modeling photocatalytic processes is important to assess these materials, and to understand and optimize their performance. In this study, the recent literature is critically reviewed and analyzed to identify and compare methods of modeling photocatalytic performance. The Langmuir–Hinshelwood model (L-H) has been used in many studies to rationalize the degradation kinetics of single contaminants because it is the simplest model including both the adsorption equilibrium and degradation rates. Other studies report the development of more sophisticated variants of the L-H model that include the rates of catalyst excitation, recombination of electron-hole pairs, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and formation of by-products. Modified Chick-Watson (C[sbnd]W) and Hom models have been used by many researchers to include lag phases of bacteria in the description of disinfection kinetics. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have been used to analyze the effects of operational conditions on photocatalyst performance. Moreover, response surface methodology (RSM) has been employed for experimental design, and optimization of operational conditions. We have reviewed and analyzed all available articles that model photocatalytic activity towards water pollution, summarized and put them in context, and recommended future research directions.
KW - Artificial neural network (ANN)
KW - Disinfection
KW - Kinetic models
KW - Photocatalysis
KW - Pollutants degradation
KW - Response surface methodology (RSM)
U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134197
DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134197
M3 - Review
C2 - 31494425
AN - SCOPUS:85071717565
VL - 698
SP - 1
EP - 16
JO - Science of the Total Environment
JF - Science of the Total Environment
SN - 0048-9697
M1 - 134197
ER -
ID: 236121601